video

Source: Craig Kelly

The Hon. Craig Kelly MP, delivered a speech to Parliament on the current status of hydroxychloroquine restrictions in Australia. He referenced ‘late treatment’ studies that do not have relevance to the current restrictions in place, referenced to large numbers of observational studies of early treatment with positive hydroxychloquine efficacy from around the world, and put to Parliament that it is immoral to remove a doctor’s freedoms to prescribe it to a patient that has contracted Covid.

He acknowledged the “many brave doctors out there supporting this (early hydroxychloroquine treatment), and speaking out against a media group-think.”

Mr Kelly also requested that the National Covid Evidence Taskforce look at the evidence; to make separate recommendations for use of hydroxychloroquine as a prophylaxis and in the early stage of treatment for patients who have contracted Covid-19.



Related: Australia: Clinical trial looks to protect high-risk healthcare workers against COVID-19 using hydroxychloroquine as preventative to corona

Outsiders: Doctors, patients should be free to decide on whether to take hydroxychloroquine

HCQ actually does work! You read it here first: Australian Spectator

COVID SHEILD to trial hydroxychloroquine for healthcare worker prophylaxis in Australia

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »