video

Source: Sky News

Liberal MP Craig Kelly says the ban placed on COVID-19 treatment hydroxychloroquine by Australian bureaucrats violates the Hippocratic Oath taken by doctors and is based on a study since proven false.

Mr Kelly said health bureaucrats interfered in the doctor-patient relationship by prohibiting the use of hydroxychloroquine even if the doctor thought the treatment would save the patient’s life.

Health bureaucrats have “violated the very first principle of the hypocritic oath” which is to ‘do no harm’,” he said.

Mr Kelly told Sky News technically bureaucrats should only ban the use of hydroxychloroquine if the evidence shows beyond all reasonable doubt that firstly, hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work and secondly, that it is dangerous.

“Recent studies show that proposition is no longer sustainable … and they must lift their bans otherwise they are engaged in crimes against humanity and they should be taken to the criminal court in the Hague,” he said. “They are withholding medical treatment from Australians that the evidence shows can save their lives.”

Mr Kelly also said the National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce which made the authoritative decision banning hydroxychloroquine rely upon the results of a flawed study conducted at the Oxford University.

He argued the study ultimately gave patients “double the dose of what they know is an overdose” and the director of the study stated doses were based on amoebic dissentry dose rates.

Sky News host Rowan Dean said the director made “clear amoebic dissentry is what they based their doses on, but we know hydroxychloroquine is never used for amoebic dissentry”.

“The bottom line is the study was flawed,” he said. “(French newspaper) France Soir themselves say the Recovery study cannot be considered serious and yet that is the study all Australian medical advice is based upon by the words of the COVID taskforce themselves who say the vast majority of evidence is from the recovery trial.”















Related: AJ and Kelly get fired up as anti-hydroxychloroquine rhetoric ignores new tsunami of science.

5,000 FILIPINO DOCTORS CALL FOR HYDYROXCHLOROQUINE TO BE USED TO TREAT COVID & END THE LOCKDOWNS.

How hydroxychloroquine works at the cellular level

El Centro hospital still uses hydroxychloroquine as working treatment for almost 1700 COVID-19 patients

Ghana: “HCQ and AZ associated with viral clearance in COVID-19 patients.” Clinical characteristics, treatment regimen and duration of hospitalization among COVID-19 patients in Ghana: a retrospective cohort study

France: Natural history of COVID-19 and therapeutic options (hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc may represent the best current theraputic option)

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »