video

Source:Sky News Australia

Liberal MP Craig Kelly reports that there has been study after study that shows that Hydroxychloroquine, when administered early, can “lower the rates of infections” of COVID-19.

He said there are state medical bureaucrats who have “interfered with the doctor-patient relationship”. “In an unprecedented step, they’ve ruled that doctors cannot prescribe this”.

Hydroxychloroquine has had many studies displaying efficacy as a potential treatment to COVID-19, however, it has been criminalised in some Australian states.

“So if we have a doctor in Queensland that thinks ‘I can save one of my patient’s lives with Hydroxychloroquine,’ and I’ve looked at all the studies, if they did, they could go to jail under the laws in Queensland,” Mr Kelly told Sky News host Alan Jones.

Mr Kelly said “this goes back to when President Trump said he thought this drug would work”. “There’s been many people that went out to prove he was wrong”.


Related: Australian MP Craig Kelly delivers powerful parliamentary speech on hydroxychloroquine

Craig Kelly: Government’s heavy-handed interference in the free independent doctor-patient right over the use of Hydroxychloroquine

The jury is IN on Hydroxychloroquine – ‘IT SAVES LIVES’: Rowan Dean

Australia: Clinical trial looks to protect high-risk healthcare workers against COVID-19 using hydroxychloroquine as preventative to corona

HCQ actually does work! You read it here first: Australian Spectator

Australian hydroxychloroquine trials continue as Lancet is questioned over incorrect data

Outsiders: Doctors, patients should be free to decide on whether to take hydroxychloroquine

C19study.com update: Now 88 international studies (51 peer reviewed) show positive hydroxychloroquine treatment outcomes

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »