Source: iltempo
Interview with the Italian researcher Andrea Savarino reveals research on 211 people, showing how prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine prevents the infection of Covid-19. 

The result of a COVID-19 prophylaxis experiment in people exposed to coronavirus positive individuals has been published in the journal International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, the official body of the International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. On February 15, a health worker tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The operator had walked freely through all the wards of the hospital, where she served. It was not possible to quarantine all those who had come into contact with the operator, the health activity would have stopped. On February 25, another person was also infected. The next day, February 26, the first post-exposure hydroxychloroquine-based prophylaxis experiment (440 mg / day) began, for as many as 211 people, including healthcare professionals and patients. After 10 days, nobody tested positive for coronavirus. To understand what this research means, we ask Andrea Savarino, a researcher from the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, and one of the leading experts of hydroxychloroquine at an international level for his publications on the matter, but also because he was the one who proposed the use of the hydroxychloroquine in 2003, to counter Sars1. 

To read the interview with the Italian researcher Andrea Savarino: https://www.iltempo.it/cronache/2020/04/21/news/coronavirus-idrossiclorochina-ricerca-malaria-andrea-savarino-trump-zelenko-clorochina-anti-malaria

To read the findings published in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092485792030145X?via=ihub

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »