Source: Beyond the Climate Author: THOMAÏE
While we learn in this article by Spiegel of September 25, 2020 that Hydroxychloroquine was in fact prescribed overwhelmingly by German doctors during the epidemic, with results in Germany much better than at home, Didier Raoult wrote in his report official given to the Senators that his results at the IHU were impossible to exceed, and that the mortality in the EHPAD was two times lower when they treated with Hydroxychloroquine.
He writes: “As for our experience, which is verifiable and verified by the Ministry of Health, by the ARS, it shows in the patients treated a mortality of 0.4%, which is one of the lowest ever seen in the world. world in the treatment of this disease, and we were able to get in touch with the home hospitalization services in EHPADs, and to show that the treatment saved half of the deaths in this situation. (…)
The ban on use in nursing homes, and on the other hand the release of the prescription of Rivotril for euthanasia, represents a question which from an ethical standpoint will probably have to be investigated ”. If these data were false, there is no doubt that Didier Raoult would already be found guilty of serious fraud.
Failing that, Craig Kelly, Member of the Australian Parliament, said on Sunday September 27, 2020 on SkyNews that the refusal to treat Covid-19 with Hydroxychloroquine violated the Hippocratic Oath and that those who continue to ban it are “involved in crimes against humanity ”and must“ be brought to criminal justice in The Hague ”. This is what FranceSoir reports in this article of September 27, 2020 .
Finally, in her interview of September 9, 2020 for Plantètes360 , geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude questioned: “Some colleagues attack Didier Raoult, very personally. Why didn’t we make this hay on Merah, the author of The Lancet, who scientifically planned the deaths of patients who should not have died (by administering unreasonable doses of hydroxychloroquine to patients) ? (…) So, instead of criticizing Didier Raoult, whose results of the study are there, which show that ultimately, he rather helped and saved lives, rather than precipitating the death of patients who should not have died, it would be better to be concerned about the lack of ethics of certain studies, and certain behaviors of scientists ”.
We can continue to pretend to believe that Didier Raoult and half of the countries in the world that recommend hydroxychloroquine with much better results than us are crazy, that our leaders are just incompetent, but we all know the reality: there is in France, and in other countries, a will to harm, to lie and to manipulate, to create a false pandemic, and to economically collapse the country.
And it will continue as long as we do nothing!
Related: HCQ is effective for COVID-19 when used early: analysis of 132 studies
Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so used early, for Covid-19: A systematic review
Professor Raoult Sues the French Health Authorities: Could Hydroxychloroquine be Rehabilitated in Court?